--- title: "BD Corner: California Appeals Court Clears Path for Greater Expungement" description: "BD Corner: California Appeals Court Clears Path for Greater Expungement" --- [![Jacko Law Group, PC - Securities Law](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/brand.png)](http://www.jackolg.com/) Call Today for a Consultation San Diego 619-298-2880 San Francisco 415-766-3599 Los Angeles 213-631-2549 Menu [Contact](http://www.jackolg.com/Contact.shtml) - [Home](http://www.jackolg.com/) - [Firm Overview](http://www.jackolg.com/Firm-Overview/) - [Professionals](http://www.jackolg.com/Professionals/) - [Events](http://www.jackolg.com/Events.shtml) - [News](http://www.jackolg.com/News-Room/) - [Blog](http://www.jackolg.com/blog/) - [Videos](http://www.jackolg.com/Videos.shtml) - [Contact](http://www.jackolg.com/Contact.shtml) # Understand. Define. Achieve. Uniquely situated to offer comprehensive services to registered investment advisers, securities broker-dealers, hedge funds, financial professionals and organizations of all sizes. View Our Practice Areas - [SEC/FINRA Regulatory Counsel](http://www.jackolg.com/Regulatory-Examinations-and-Inquiries-SEC-and-FINRA/) - [Private Equity & Hedge Fund Counsel](http://www.jackolg.com/Private-Equity-Counsel/) - [Investment Adviser Services](http://www.jackolg.com/Legal-Considerations-for-Breaking-Away/Investment-Adviser-Counsel.shtml) - [Breakaways And Transitions](http://www.jackolg.com/Legal-Considerations-for-Breaking-Away/) - [General Corporate Counsel](http://www.jackolg.com/Corporate-Counsel/) - [Broker- Dealer Counsel](http://www.jackolg.com/Broker-Dealer-Counsel/) #### News - [Legal Tips](http://www.jackolg.com/News-Room/) - [Publications](http://www.jackolg.com/News-Room/Publications.shtml) - [Blog](http://www.jackolg.com/blog/) # Jacko Law Group Blog # BD Corner: California Appeals Court Clears Path for Greater Expungement Last month, the California Court of Appeal in San Francisco issued an opinion in [Lickiss v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority](http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A134179.PDF) explicitly permitting courts across the state to use an equitable balancing test in order to determine whether a broker’s CRD record can be expunged. The broker in the case, Edwin Lickiss, defeated FINRA’s attempts to have his expungement case thrown out of court after 18 months of litigation. Lickiss is seeking to expunge 17 arbitration matters stemming from a REIT investment he recommended to clients from 1987 to 1991 that ultimately went south, and one FINRA rule violation that was resolved in 1997. FINRA argued successfully in the trial court that the standard set forth in [FINRA Rule 2080(b)(1)](http://finra.complinet.com/en/display/display_main.html?rbid=2403&element_id=8468), rather than the court’s inherent equitable powers, governed Lickiss’s expungement petition. That Rule states that a FINRA member or associated person (like Lickiss) that petitions a court for expungement relief, or seeks judicial confirmation of an arbitration award containing expungment relief, must name FINRA as a party unless FINRA waives that obligation as a result of an “affirmative judicial or arbitral findings that: (A) the claim, allegation or information is factually impossible or clearly erroneous; (B) the registered person was not involved in the alleged investment-related sales practice violation, forgery, theft, misappropriation or conversion of funds; or (C) the claim, allegation or information is false.” The relief sought by Lickiss did not fall within this narrow provision; rather, Lickiss argued the court should use its equitable power to remove the disclosures because they “occurred anciently,” his “regulatory record has long since been and remained clean,” and because the “material sought to be expunged was overwhelminghly caused by the failure of a single investment security which Petitioner brokered for nothing more than ordinary commissions and over which Petitioner had no control or influence.” In rejecting FINRA’s argument that Rule 2080(b)(1) provides the standard for the trial court’s determination of whether Lickiss’s record could be expunged, the appellate court described Rule 2080(b) as “a procedural rule that does not provide any substantive criteria as to when expungment would be appropriate.” Permitting Lickiss’s petition to proceed, the appellate court confirmed an equitable balancing test should be used—i.e., weighing the equities favoring expungement against the detriment to the public should expungment be granted. The appellate court stated that the trial court’s use of the “very narrow, rigid legal rule to assess the legal sufficiency of Lickiss’s petition—a choice that closed off all avenues to the court’s conscience in formulating a decree and disregarded basic principals of equity—was nothing short of an end run around equity.” While he may still face an uphill battle in convincing the trial court to expunge his record under the balancing standard adopted by the court of appeals, Lickiss and other brokers seeking expungment now have that chance. For further information about expungment or other securities or compliance concerns, please contact the author at sarah.weber@jackolg.com or (619)298-2880. ### Legal Tip Archive - [September 2011 (5)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/09) - [April 2014 (5)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/04) - [August 2014 (5)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/08) - [September 2015 (5)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/09) - [August 2011 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/08) - [October 2011 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/10) - [June 2012 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/06) - [July 2012 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/07) - [August 2012 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/08) - [October 2012 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/10) - [November 2012 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/11) - [January 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/01) - [March 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/03) - [April 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/04) - [May 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/05) - [June 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/06) - [September 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/09) - [October 2013 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/10) - [January 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/01) - [February 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/02) - [March 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/03) - [May 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/05) - [June 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/06) - [July 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/07) - [December 2014 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/12) - [January 2016 (4)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2016/01) - [November 2011 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/11) - [December 2011 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/12) - [January 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/01) - [February 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/02) - [April 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/04) - [May 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/05) - [September 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/09) - [December 2012 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/12) - [July 2013 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/07) - [August 2013 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/08) - [November 2013 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/11) - [December 2013 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/12) - [January 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/01) - [February 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/02) - [March 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/03) - [July 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/07) - [August 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/08) - [November 2015 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/11) - [February 2016 (3)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2016/02) - [March 2012 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2012/03) - [February 2013 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2013/02) - [October 2014 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/10) - [November 2014 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/11) - [April 2015 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/04) - [May 2015 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/05) - [June 2015 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/06) - [October 2015 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/10) - [December 2015 (2)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2015/12) - [July 2011 (1)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2011/07) - [September 2014 (1)](https://resources.jackolg.com/archive/2014/09) see all #### News - [Legal Tips](http://www.jackolg.com/News-Room/) - [Publications](http://www.jackolg.com/News-Room/Publications.shtml) - [Blog](http://www.jackolg.com/blog/) [Email Us For A Response](http://www.jackolg.com/Contact.shtml) #### How Can We Help? Email us to request more information or to schedule an appointment. **Bold** labels are required. #### Follow Us ON - [![Facebook](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/facebook.jpg)![Facebook](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/facebook-o.jpg)](https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jacko-Law-Group-PC/293111140703429)Facebook - [![Google Plus](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/google-plus.jpg)![Google Plus](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/google-plus-o.jpg)](https://plus.google.com/103406198138900359700/posts)Google Plus - [![LinkedIn](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/linkedin.jpg)![LinkedIn](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/linkedin-o.jpg)](https://www.linkedin.com/company/469106?trk=vsrp_companies_res_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A1915712591417541495513%2CVSRPtargetId%3A469106%2CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary)LinkedIn - [![Twitter](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/twitter.jpg)![Twitter](https://resources.jackolg.com/hubfs/Jackolawgroup%20February2018/image/twitter-o.jpg)](https://twitter.com/JackoLawGroup)Twitter **San Diego Office** 1350 Columbia Street Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101 [Map & Directions](https://maps.google.com/?q=Jacko+Law+Group,+PC+1350+Columbia+Street+Suite+300+San+Diego+CA+92101) Toll Free: 866-497-2298 Phone: 213-631-2549 Phone: 619-298-2880 Fax: 619-298-2882 **San Francisco Office** Four Embarcadero Center Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 [Map & Directions](https://www.google.co.in/maps/place/4+Embarcadero+Center,+San+Francisco,+CA+94111,+USA/@37.7950648,-122.3986392,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x808580613083aa1d:0x7e2bd59759260996) Phone: 415-766-3599 **Los Angeles Office** 535 N. Brand Boulevard Suite 279 Glendale, CA 91203 [Map & Directions](https://www.google.co.in/maps/place/535+N+Brand+Blvd+%23279,+Glendale,+CA+91203,+USA/@34.154319,-118.2576643,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x80c2c05300cb02e7:0xa610477ee4f38e64) Phone: 213-631-2549 © 2018 by [Jacko Law Group, PC](http://pview.findlaw.com/cmd/view?wld_id=4003514&pid=1). All rights reserved. [Disclaimer](http://www.jackolg.com/Disclaimer.shtml) | [Site Map](http://www.jackolg.com/Site-Map.shtml) [Privacy Policy](http://www.jackolg.com/Privacy-Policy.shtml) | [Business Development Solutions](https://www.lawyermarketing.com/?utm_source=FirmSite&utm_medium=footer%2Bcopyright&utm_term=law%2Bfirm%2Bmarketing&utm_campaign=FirmSite%2BInbound) by [FindLaw](http://www.findlaw.com/), part of Thomson Reuters.