On October 24, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s (MSRB) Rule G-44, which is the MSRB’s first dedicated rule for municipal advisors. The new requirements take effect April 23, 2015, giving firms six months to implement the required policies and procedures.
Read MoreJacko Law Group Blog
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today released an order instituting administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against an investment advisory firm and three top officials for violating the custody rule that requires firms to follow certain procedures when they control client money or securities. Advisory firms can comply with the custody rule by distributing audited financial statements to fund investors within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year. The custody rule provides investors with verification of their assets to protect against misuse or theft.
According to the SEC’s order instituting an administrative proceeding, Sands Brothers Asset Management LLC (SBAM) provides investment advisory services to a number of pooled investment vehicles, and wrongly stated in its Form ADV that it does not have custody of client assets. The SEC alleges that SBAM violated the custody rule by not timely distributing audited financial statements to investors in ten private funds. According to the SEC, SBAM was at least 40 days late to distribute statements in 2010. SBAM was allegedly six months to eight months late in delivering the audited financial statements for those same funds late the very next year. The same statements for 2012 were distributed approximately three months late.
Notably, in 2010, SBAM and two co-founders were sanctioned by the SEC for custody rule violations. The SEC’s order found that that SBAM “willfully violated the custody rule by improperly relying on the pooled investment vehicle alternative, which allowed for the distribution of audited financial statements in lieu of submitting to a surprise examination by an independent public accountant to verify custody of assets, among other requirements.”
“The custody rule is not a technicality. It is a critical investor protection provision designed to help ensure that investor assets are safe,” said Andrew Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. “Sands Brothers and its senior-most officers have persistently disregarded their obligations under the law and left their clients waiting for months at a time to have the materials they need to verify the existence and value of fund assets.”
For more information on this and other related subjects, please contact us at info@jackolg.com or (619) 298-2880.
Read MoreLegal Tip Archive
- September 2011 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2011 (4)
- October 2011 (4)
- June 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (4)
- January 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (4)
- June 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (4)
- January 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (4)
- December 2014 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- November 2011 (3)
- December 2011 (3)
- January 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (3)
- December 2012 (3)
- July 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (3)
- December 2013 (3)
- January 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (3)
- July 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (3)
- February 2016 (3)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2013 (2)
- October 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- April 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (2)
- December 2015 (2)
- July 2011 (1)
- September 2014 (1)